Earlier this month I was interviewed by Connie Thompson, the Consumer Reporter for KOMO News, Channel 4 in Seattle. Connie is an ace when it comes to interviews, always making me feel comfortable and at ease. It was actually a lot of fun to just sit and chat in my operating room after the office had closed down for the day. I barely knew the camera was running.
The subject matter was why I feel surgery procedures should not be patented, licensed or trade marked. I had a number of objections to this, as does The AMA which recently passed a resolution condemning this trend. I took notes beforehand, most of which Connie let me get into the interview. But the next week when I re-read what I had jotted down, it really made a lot of sense to turn that into my second blog on my website. So here, expanded and corrected into sentences and paragraphs are my prep notes for that interview.
Dear KOMO Viewers:
The quality of any surgical result really depends more on the experience and skill of the surgeon than the technique used. Cookie cutter approaches are for cookies not your own unique face. A good surgeon will take what he knows about two or three different procedures and combine or modify them to get the best result for you. Having only one tool in the tool box means only a few patients will look much better with it than if you can use your artistry and imagination, and all the tools you have available.
When you ask your carpenter to remodel your older kitchen would you tell him he could only use a hammer? I think not!
Everyone’s skin and muscle configuration is a little different and needs a custom approach. While you might be able to buy a dress off the shelf without modification you shouldn’t buy your new face off the shelf.
Aging depends on several things, especially how much sun damage you have had. Equally important is the genes you got from your mother and father. Patented, “one style fits all” procedures over-simplify this equation and overlook these unique problems.
There are more than a dozen types of mini-lifts that have been published down through the years in the Plastic Surgery scientific journals. They all have one thing in common: a short scar may mean a short recovery. But are the benefits also short lived? I know my results can last up to ten years or more in some patients but in others who have crummy skin and a lot of sun damage I would never make that kind of promise.
Since I cannot tell how these patented procedures go about it I can’t tell you whether they are good or bad ideas. The surgeons who sign up with these companies sign very complex agreements that they will never discuss with anybody how the procedure is done or they can be sued for huge amounts of money. What they are really signing up for is the marketing program that comes with it. Long infomercials are expensive. I could never afford to do one on my own. (nor do I feel I need to.)
I suspect that the only breakthrough here is in the marketing not the technique used. These contracts signed by the surgeon who is seen on TV specifies that a certain portion of the fee he or she collects before the surgery automatically goes back to the company right away. Guess what THAT pays for. Most consumers don’t understand it. Unfortuantley they are blinded by the promise they can go back to their regular lifestyle in a few days. But you know what? I have lots of patients that do that too. I just am very careful not to promise it because there can always be a patient who bruises more than I, or she, expected. Recovery will be a few days longer for her but I didn’t mislead her to sign up for surgery with a false promise.
Some of these techniques are more related to marketing than any surgical breakthrough. I read the ads in the Sunday newspaper and shiver thinking of how misleading they can be and that a few poor patients are going to be angry in the end. That’s when they come back to me or other Board Certified Plastic Surgeons.
The worst problems can take me hours to reverse. Putting suspension sutures into a patient’s face, a technique that goes by names like “threadlifts,” etc, doesn’t last long in my opinion. In fact they can relax in a matter of months not years. When I have to take those nasty sutures out and do the right procedure that the person should have had in the first place I am going to charge them my normal fee. I have some remorse for these poor patients, but I don’t give away sorrow. They wind up paying a high price for not doing their homework first.
Some of these procedures are treated like a “Trade Secret” not a patent. It’s like the formula for Coca-Cola. No one outside of the top echelon in the company really knows what’s in it. While this may be cool for a soft drink wouldn’t you want to know what’s going on before you spend thousands of dollars on your face?
Medical breakthroughs are based on the time honored tradition of sharing new knowledge not protecting it. It improves and refines the technique when it is peer reviewed by other doctors. They can try it out, modify it and report their own breakthroughs in it. But every other surgeon then gets to benefit from the new modifications right away. This also tests whether or not this new procedure really is an authentic breakthrough.
Restricting access to the new technique can prohibit dissemination of new knowledge. This trend, if it got larger, would bring innovations in health care to a standstill. It sets a dangerous precedent and is opposed by the AMA and lots of other medical groups. No one wants to stymie medical advancement like this, whether it is cosmetic surgery or life saving devices or medications. The trend is really bothersome to a lot of us.
Thank you, Connie Thompson and KOMO for letting me tell the public about what they really need to know.
Learn more about this plastic surgeon in Seattle Washington